PDA

View Full Version : The challenge of historical documentation on arnis.



arnisador
05-01-2010, 01:10 AM
The challenge of historical documentation on arnis (http://www.manilatimes.net/index.php/component/content/article/42-rokstories/15652-the-challenge-of-historical-documentation-on-arnis)



Besides the Department of Education (DepEd) and the Philippine Sports Commission (PSC), another government agency that will be actively involved in the implementation of the Arnis Law is the National Commission for Culture and the Arts (NCCA).

Sen. Juan Miguel Zubiri said that the NCCA’s role is primarily to oversee long overdue documentation of the history of the different styles of arnis.

While there are available works on the subject written by foreigners, the senator bemoaned that many of these writings are half-baked. “Some of them just made a two-month tour of the Philippines then produced a book,” he said. With the NCCA commissioned to do the job, Zubiri added that he was hoping to come up with a book or a general almanac of Filipino Martial Arts (FMA).
[...]
Unlike other Asian martial arts whose historical records are preserved through written and pictorial documents, arnis and the FMA’s history in general are hard to validate because of lack of proper documentation. For instance and despite debates on the claim of some FMA historians that kali is the ancestral art of arnis and escrima, the dispute has remained unresolved. The row could be attributed to
lack of valid historical references.

Most articles and books on FMA history circulated up to the 1980s were based on Mga Karunungan sa Larong Arnis (A Body of Knowledge in the Sport of Arnis) by Mirafuente. Written in archaic Tagalog and published by the University of the Philippines Press in 1957, it was the first definitive book on arnis. While the two authors produced an excellent presentation of the technical aspects of arnis, they failed to include a comprehensive bibliography of their sources, which later historians could use to validate the historical contents of their book. Among the authors’ claims was that kali is the original Filipino martial art. With the commissioning of the NCCA, with its pool of experts to conduct documentation on the history of arnis, the bibliography issue, for one, could be resolved.
[...]
Ned Nepangue, researcher, author and practitioner of the FMA, told The Manila Times that a good strategy to the historical documentation of arnis is to examine it through three perspectives: sports, aesthetics and combat. Nepangue with another FMA researcher and practitioner, Celestino Macachor, wrote the book Cebuano Eskrima: Beyond the Myth.

Felipe Jocano Jr., a professor of Anthropology at the University of the Philippines in Diliman, Quezon City, and an arnis master, encourages not only professional historians but also the average arnisadors to do research on the history of the FMA.

Bob Hubbard
05-01-2010, 02:11 AM
From conversations I've had with several long timers, it seems that much of the history is passed on verbally, subject to memory and personal spin distorting much of it over the years. I think I've read a dozen contradictory histories of Modern Arnis alone, and that's just 1 art among many.

Brian R. VanCise
05-01-2010, 09:16 AM
Yes there is a lot of spin and personal interpretation. I think that Historical researchers need to delve in and get to the root of the history of Arnis, Eskrima and Kali. Leave no bones about it and pick no sides.

jwinch2
05-01-2010, 09:24 AM
That is probably not going to happen unless you get someone who is not involved in the art and is only interested in the information from an academic perspective. Historians aren't going to be the only ones involved either. You are going to need a team of people including anthropologists, archeologists, geographers, historians, etc... To do it properly would be extremely expensive and would involved desecrating the graves and burial sites of the elders and ancients. That sort of thing is hard to get people to agree to. You are going to need significant funding (which comes with a point of view typically) and carte blanch to do what needs to be done. Otherwise, it isn't going to happen.

I have read most of what is out there in terms of FMA history over the last several months. Some parts are good, most are not.

gagimilo
05-02-2010, 10:11 AM
That is probably not going to happen unless you get someone who is not involved in the art and is only interested in the information from an academic perspective....

Well, that might turn out to be double-edged sword. I remember reading John Keagan's "History of warfare", in which he nicely notes that curators of many a military museum he had visited are utterly uninformed and ignorant about the functional aspects of the very items they lecture on, i.e. the period weaponry exhibited. Sure, they can tell you volumes about the ornamental decorations on sword handles and basket-hilts, even go at length about the regional and era styles of aesthetical aspects of those weapons, but next to nothing about how the manner of utilization changed with times. This lack of insight could hinder the understanding about how, and more importantly why, thigs happened at certain times and in particular places, which in turn would make for more educated guess about some historical events.

Brian R. VanCise
05-02-2010, 10:22 AM
Very good points above! It would be cool but probably is not going to happen so it is what it is at this point and each individual needs to delve into the stories presented themselves.

arnisador
05-02-2010, 11:53 PM
I too hope some disinterested academics, from various disciplines, will tackle the issue...govt. funding can make that happen!

jwinch2
05-03-2010, 01:08 AM
Well, that might turn out to be double-edged sword. I remember reading John Keagan's "History of warfare", in which he nicely notes that curators of many a military museum he had visited are utterly uninformed and ignorant about the functional aspects of the very items they lecture on, i.e. the period weaponry exhibited. Sure, they can tell you volumes about the ornamental decorations on sword handles and basket-hilts, even go at length about the regional and era styles of aesthetical aspects of those weapons, but next to nothing about how the manner of utilization changed with times. This lack of insight could hinder the understanding about how, and more importantly why, thigs happened at certain times and in particular places, which in turn would make for more educated guess about some historical events.

There is a difference between being knowledgeable of warfare in such a way that allows you to properly interpret your findings, and having preference towards a given system or style.